M. Gómez Rúa, B. Moreno, E. Molis

We address the problem of making a binary decision under two possible states of the world, where each decision is correct in one of the states. Every agent in a society has preferences regarding the different state-decision pairs, which shape their initial inclination towards one of the decisions before receiving any information about the actual state. This inclination can be formalized as a threshold we refer to as bias. The goal of this paper is to provide micro-foundations for how social bias is formed and how it determines the final collective decision. First, we present a method for aggregating agent biases using Bias Aggregation Rules. Second, we explore an indirect method of aggregation, using a Social Welfare Function that derives a social utility function from individual utility functions over the state-decision pairs. Finally, we examine the conditions under which these two aggregating methods of aggregating agent biases are equivalent and yield the same collective decision.

Keywords: Decision Rule, Expected Utility, Social Welfare Function; Consistency

Scheduled

GT Teoría de Juegos II: extensiones modelo TU
September 3, 2026  11:10 AM
Aula 22


Other papers in the same session

Some Results on Monotonicity in Cost Sharing

M. J. Albizuri Irigoien, J. M. Zarzuelo Zarzosa

Replication by cloned players in coalitional games

Á. de Prado Saborido, M. Á. Mirás Calvo, M. E. Sánchez Rodríguez


Cookie policy

We use cookies in order to be able to identify and authenticate you on the website. They are necessary for the correct functioning of it, and therefore they can not be disabled. If you continue browsing the website, you are agreeing with their acceptance, as well as our Privacy Policy.

Additionally, we use Google Analytics in order to analyze the website traffic. They also use cookies and you can accept or refuse them with the buttons below.

You can read more details about our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.